skip to Main Content

Abstract

Do People Make Decisions via an Error-prone Bag of Tricks?

Human behavior often deviates from the utility maximizing “rational” agent. This is usually attributed to people relying on an assortment of cheap heuristics to make efficient, but frequently biased, decisions. While the heuristics and biases research program has highlighted the many deviations of human behavior from that of simplistic rational agents, it has also yielded a morass of idiosyncratic, unreliable, and often contradictory biases, with no method to decide which heuristics will play a role in a given situation. Here I will describe our recent progress on an alternate approach: accounting for human successes and foibles by assuming that people are more sophisticated, robust, and probabilistic than simple economic agents, but must carry out these sophisticated inferences under cognitive resource constraints.

Wednesday, May 31, 2017
CSE 1202

Read Next

Niloufar Salehi (UC Berkeley)

Wednesday, October 23, 2019 at 4:00 P.M.
Design for Collective Action and Accountability
CSE 1202 on the UCSD campus

Ryan Kastner (UC San Diego)

Wednesday, May 18, 2016 at 4:00 PM
Engineers for Exploration
CSE1202 on the UCSD Campus

Danielle Bragg (University of Washington)

Wednesday, January 17, 2018 at 4:00 PM
Building Accessible Information Systems: A Data-Driven Approach
CSE 1202 on the UCSD Campus
Back To Top