skip to Main Content
CHI 2019 conference in Glasgow, Scotland

Design Lab Weaves the Threads of CHI 2019

Design Lab Weaves the Threads of CHI 2019

Design Lab Weaves the Threads of CHI 2019

From May 4-9, 2019, the ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems took place in Glasgow, Scotland. Called “CHI” for short, this annual and prominent event brings together thousands of the world’s leading researchers, designers, and scientists in human-computer interaction. 

Design Lab members walked away with a number of awards for their research. Post-doctoral Fellow Sarah Fox won a Best Paper Award for “Managerial Visions: Stories of upgrading and maintaining the public restroom with IoT”. Honorable Mentions went to Graduate Student Dorothy Howard and Professor Lilly Irani for “Ways of Knowing When Research Subjects Care”, and Graduate Student Sean Kross and Professor Philip Guo for “Practitioners Teaching Data Science in Industry and Academia”.


Pictured Left to Right: Ailie Fraser, Tricia Ngoon

Graudate Students Ailie Fraser and Tricia Ngoon, and Professor Scott Klemmer also received an Honorable Mention for “RePlay: Contextually Presenting Learning Videos Across Software Applications”. “A lot of the time when you’re working in complex software, you’ll end up searching the internet for some kind of help … but it can be really hard to sift through all the search results, and figure out what parts are relevant to you and your particular task,” says Fraser. “We built a system called RePlay that supports you across different applications as you’re working, and makes it easier to find relevant help.”

CHI attracts people from many disciplines around the world within HCI, giving attendees the chance to interact with different fields of research. 


Pictured: Tricia Ngoon

Ngoon participated in a Doctoral Consortium, where students present their thesis work and receive feedback from peers and faculty mentors. “What I liked about it was that you got to hear from these very different spectrums of research, and because it’s CHI and it’s so broad, I don’t think you’d get that elsewhere because it’s a little more niche,” Ngoon says. 

This year, some Design Lab attendees chose to focus on talks or sessions from subfields outside their core research areas. 

The first session I went to was on social justice, but the work in that domain is relevant and interesting being that they talked about things like resources for domestic abuse victims, and the design space of how do you help these people. One of the takeaways from that talk was the idea that if we designed for everyone, we couldn’t help anyone [because] services would be flooded and they wouldn’t be able to prioritize anyone,” says graduate student Steven Rick. “I thought that was really nice to think about because in health that’s very much a problem — you only have so much bandwidth, you only have so many resources you can provide. Not only do we want people in rural places to see specialists, but specialists also need to see people who are close to them, and one neurologist can’t see 100 patients a day. So, how do you design to resolve those inherent bottlenecks or even think about those bottlenecks at all.”

Listening to talks from other subfields was also valuable for Ph.D. student Sean Kross. “Even though the talk might be in a completely different field that isn’t directly related to what I do, it’s important to go out and see what other people are interested in and what their discoveries are. I think that those findings do have a major impact on how I think about my work,” he says. “One strategy is you can take a method that other researchers have already validated, and you can apply that to something else. Talks make me reconsider what tools I take for granted in my life that I could translate into something useful or innovative in my research.”


Pictured Left to Right: Sean Kross, Ailie Fraser, Tricia Ngoon, Steven Rick

CHI’s attendance has been growing every year; in 2018, the conference surpassed 3,000 participants, and that number is only increasing. Because of the large nature of the conference, workshops are a great way to connect with a smaller group of people. 

I really enjoyed the [live streaming] workshop that I attended because it gave me a chance to do some very interactive, collaborative work with a small group of people,” says Fraser. “This one had around 15 people, so it was very intimate. We spent the first hour or two on presentations, but really the rest of the day was generating ideas, working together and brainstorming, and sticking post-it notes everywhere. So that was really fun; I feel like we came up with a bunch of interesting ideas, and I made a lot of great connections that I hope to follow up on.” 

This year marked the first time CHI was held in Scotland. “My last name is Fraser, which is a [Scottish] clan, and my first name is also Scottish, so it was really cool to get to go and see a lot of the culture there and the history,” says Fraser. “I think it was a very welcoming place, which is nice for CHI; lots of bagpipes, lots of music everywhere, and everyone was very nice and very friendly.” 

The 2019 conference theme was “Weaving the Threads of CHI,” and CHI has once again proven to be an amazing platform to gather the greater HCI community to focus on advances in interactive technology. 


Pictured Left to Right: Nadir Weibel, Ailie Fraser, Dorothy Howard, Tricia Ngoon, Sean Kross, Steven Rick, Danilo Gasques Rodrigues

It might sound a little negative, but you don’t go to conferences to read papers and listen to talks. That’s a nice side effect of the fact that you’re all gathering under a common theme, so you can get together and listen to research and think about interesting stuff,” says Rick. “But at its core, you go for the network. You go to see people, to talk, to do stuff that’s not explicitly tied to the papers that are being presented. Because they’re all going to end up online, and you’ll read them later, and you hope that the talks give you something that’s not in the paper, and the conversations you have after the talks with the authors prompt an idea or thought that neither of you thought of, or build a collaboration or give you access to something that you didn’t have. You’re looking for a mutually beneficial social experience.


CHI 2019 Design Lab Publications:

How Guiding Questions Facilitate Feedback Exchange in Project-Based Learning, Amy Cook, Jessica Hammer, Salma Elsayed-Ali, and Steven P. Dow. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Inventive Scaffolds Catalyze Creative Learning, Tricia J. Ngoon. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Abstract from Doctoral Consortium

Managerial Visions: Stories of upgrading and maintaining the public restroom with IoT, Sarah Fox, Kiley Sobel, Daniela Rosner. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Practitioners Teaching Data Science in Industry and Academia, Sean Kross, Philip Guo. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

RePlay: Contextually Presenting Learning Videos Across Software Applications, C. Ailie Fraser, Tricia J. Ngoon, Mira Dontcheva, Scott Klemmer. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Social Applications for Inbodied Interaction: Improving Health Outcomes by Integrating Personal Knowledge, Community, and Data, Vineet Pandey. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Workshop Paper

Ways of Knowing When Research Subjects Care, Dorothy Howard, Lilly Irani. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

From May 4-9, 2019, the ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems took place in Glasgow, Scotland. Called “CHI” for short, this annual and prominent event brings together thousands of the world’s leading researchers, designers, and scientists in human-computer interaction. 

Design Lab members walked away with a number of awards for their research. Post-doctoral Fellow Sarah Fox won a Best Paper Award for “Managerial Visions: Stories of upgrading and maintaining the public restroom with IoT”. Honorable Mentions went to Graduate Student Dorothy Howard and Professor Lilly Irani for “Ways of Knowing When Research Subjects Care”, and Graduate Student Sean Kross and Professor Philip Guo for “Practitioners Teaching Data Science in Industry and Academia”.


Pictured Left to Right: Ailie Fraser, Tricia Ngoon

Graudate Students Ailie Fraser and Tricia Ngoon, and Professor Scott Klemmer also received an Honorable Mention for “RePlay: Contextually Presenting Learning Videos Across Software Applications”. “A lot of the time when you’re working in complex software, you’ll end up searching the internet for some kind of help … but it can be really hard to sift through all the search results, and figure out what parts are relevant to you and your particular task,” says Fraser. “We built a system called RePlay that supports you across different applications as you’re working, and makes it easier to find relevant help.”

CHI attracts people from many disciplines around the world within HCI, giving attendees the chance to interact with different fields of research. 


Pictured: Tricia Ngoon

Ngoon participated in a Doctoral Consortium, where students present their thesis work and receive feedback from peers and faculty mentors. “What I liked about it was that you got to hear from these very different spectrums of research, and because it’s CHI and it’s so broad, I don’t think you’d get that elsewhere because it’s a little more niche,” Ngoon says. 

This year, some Design Lab attendees chose to focus on talks or sessions from subfields outside their core research areas. 

The first session I went to was on social justice, but the work in that domain is relevant and interesting being that they talked about things like resources for domestic abuse victims, and the design space of how do you help these people. One of the takeaways from that talk was the idea that if we designed for everyone, we couldn’t help anyone [because] services would be flooded and they wouldn’t be able to prioritize anyone,” says graduate student Steven Rick. “I thought that was really nice to think about because in health that’s very much a problem — you only have so much bandwidth, you only have so many resources you can provide. Not only do we want people in rural places to see specialists, but specialists also need to see people who are close to them, and one neurologist can’t see 100 patients a day. So, how do you design to resolve those inherent bottlenecks or even think about those bottlenecks at all.”

Listening to talks from other subfields was also valuable for Ph.D. student Sean Kross. “Even though the talk might be in a completely different field that isn’t directly related to what I do, it’s important to go out and see what other people are interested in and what their discoveries are. I think that those findings do have a major impact on how I think about my work,” he says. “One strategy is you can take a method that other researchers have already validated, and you can apply that to something else. Talks make me reconsider what tools I take for granted in my life that I could translate into something useful or innovative in my research.”


Pictured Left to Right: Sean Kross, Ailie Fraser, Tricia Ngoon, Steven Rick

CHI’s attendance has been growing every year; in 2018, the conference surpassed 3,000 participants, and that number is only increasing. Because of the large nature of the conference, workshops are a great way to connect with a smaller group of people. 

I really enjoyed the [live streaming] workshop that I attended because it gave me a chance to do some very interactive, collaborative work with a small group of people,” says Fraser. “This one had around 15 people, so it was very intimate. We spent the first hour or two on presentations, but really the rest of the day was generating ideas, working together and brainstorming, and sticking post-it notes everywhere. So that was really fun; I feel like we came up with a bunch of interesting ideas, and I made a lot of great connections that I hope to follow up on.” 

This year marked the first time CHI was held in Scotland. “My last name is Fraser, which is a [Scottish] clan, and my first name is also Scottish, so it was really cool to get to go and see a lot of the culture there and the history,” says Fraser. “I think it was a very welcoming place, which is nice for CHI; lots of bagpipes, lots of music everywhere, and everyone was very nice and very friendly.” 

The 2019 conference theme was “Weaving the Threads of CHI,” and CHI has once again proven to be an amazing platform to gather the greater HCI community to focus on advances in interactive technology. 


Pictured Left to Right: Nadir Weibel, Ailie Fraser, Dorothy Howard, Tricia Ngoon, Sean Kross, Steven Rick, Danilo Gasques Rodrigues

It might sound a little negative, but you don’t go to conferences to read papers and listen to talks. That’s a nice side effect of the fact that you’re all gathering under a common theme, so you can get together and listen to research and think about interesting stuff,” says Rick. “But at its core, you go for the network. You go to see people, to talk, to do stuff that’s not explicitly tied to the papers that are being presented. Because they’re all going to end up online, and you’ll read them later, and you hope that the talks give you something that’s not in the paper, and the conversations you have after the talks with the authors prompt an idea or thought that neither of you thought of, or build a collaboration or give you access to something that you didn’t have. You’re looking for a mutually beneficial social experience.


CHI 2019 Design Lab Publications:

How Guiding Questions Facilitate Feedback Exchange in Project-Based Learning, Amy Cook, Jessica Hammer, Salma Elsayed-Ali, and Steven P. Dow. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Inventive Scaffolds Catalyze Creative Learning, Tricia J. Ngoon. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Abstract from Doctoral Consortium

Managerial Visions: Stories of upgrading and maintaining the public restroom with IoT, Sarah Fox, Kiley Sobel, Daniela Rosner. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Practitioners Teaching Data Science in Industry and Academia, Sean Kross, Philip Guo. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

RePlay: Contextually Presenting Learning Videos Across Software Applications, C. Ailie Fraser, Tricia J. Ngoon, Mira Dontcheva, Scott Klemmer. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Social Applications for Inbodied Interaction: Improving Health Outcomes by Integrating Personal Knowledge, Community, and Data, Vineet Pandey. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Workshop Paper

Ways of Knowing When Research Subjects Care, Dorothy Howard, Lilly Irani. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

From May 4-9, 2019, the ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems took place in Glasgow, Scotland. Called “CHI” for short, this annual and prominent event brings together thousands of the world’s leading researchers, designers, and scientists in human-computer interaction. 

Design Lab members walked away with a number of awards for their research. Post-doctoral Fellow Sarah Fox won a Best Paper Award for “Managerial Visions: Stories of upgrading and maintaining the public restroom with IoT”. Honorable Mentions went to Graduate Student Dorothy Howard and Professor Lilly Irani for “Ways of Knowing When Research Subjects Care”, and Graduate Student Sean Kross and Professor Philip Guo for “Practitioners Teaching Data Science in Industry and Academia”.


Pictured Left to Right: Ailie Fraser, Tricia Ngoon

Graudate Students Ailie Fraser and Tricia Ngoon, and Professor Scott Klemmer also received an Honorable Mention for “RePlay: Contextually Presenting Learning Videos Across Software Applications”. “A lot of the time when you’re working in complex software, you’ll end up searching the internet for some kind of help … but it can be really hard to sift through all the search results, and figure out what parts are relevant to you and your particular task,” says Fraser. “We built a system called RePlay that supports you across different applications as you’re working, and makes it easier to find relevant help.”

CHI attracts people from many disciplines around the world within HCI, giving attendees the chance to interact with different fields of research. 


Pictured: Tricia Ngoon

Ngoon participated in a Doctoral Consortium, where students present their thesis work and receive feedback from peers and faculty mentors. “What I liked about it was that you got to hear from these very different spectrums of research, and because it’s CHI and it’s so broad, I don’t think you’d get that elsewhere because it’s a little more niche,” Ngoon says. 

This year, some Design Lab attendees chose to focus on talks or sessions from subfields outside their core research areas. 

The first session I went to was on social justice, but the work in that domain is relevant and interesting being that they talked about things like resources for domestic abuse victims, and the design space of how do you help these people. One of the takeaways from that talk was the idea that if we designed for everyone, we couldn’t help anyone [because] services would be flooded and they wouldn’t be able to prioritize anyone,” says graduate student Steven Rick. “I thought that was really nice to think about because in health that’s very much a problem — you only have so much bandwidth, you only have so many resources you can provide. Not only do we want people in rural places to see specialists, but specialists also need to see people who are close to them, and one neurologist can’t see 100 patients a day. So, how do you design to resolve those inherent bottlenecks or even think about those bottlenecks at all.”

Listening to talks from other subfields was also valuable for Ph.D. student Sean Kross. “Even though the talk might be in a completely different field that isn’t directly related to what I do, it’s important to go out and see what other people are interested in and what their discoveries are. I think that those findings do have a major impact on how I think about my work,” he says. “One strategy is you can take a method that other researchers have already validated, and you can apply that to something else. Talks make me reconsider what tools I take for granted in my life that I could translate into something useful or innovative in my research.”


Pictured Left to Right: Sean Kross, Ailie Fraser, Tricia Ngoon, Steven Rick

CHI’s attendance has been growing every year; in 2018, the conference surpassed 3,000 participants, and that number is only increasing. Because of the large nature of the conference, workshops are a great way to connect with a smaller group of people. 

I really enjoyed the [live streaming] workshop that I attended because it gave me a chance to do some very interactive, collaborative work with a small group of people,” says Fraser. “This one had around 15 people, so it was very intimate. We spent the first hour or two on presentations, but really the rest of the day was generating ideas, working together and brainstorming, and sticking post-it notes everywhere. So that was really fun; I feel like we came up with a bunch of interesting ideas, and I made a lot of great connections that I hope to follow up on.” 

This year marked the first time CHI was held in Scotland. “My last name is Fraser, which is a [Scottish] clan, and my first name is also Scottish, so it was really cool to get to go and see a lot of the culture there and the history,” says Fraser. “I think it was a very welcoming place, which is nice for CHI; lots of bagpipes, lots of music everywhere, and everyone was very nice and very friendly.” 

The 2019 conference theme was “Weaving the Threads of CHI,” and CHI has once again proven to be an amazing platform to gather the greater HCI community to focus on advances in interactive technology. 


Pictured Left to Right: Nadir Weibel, Ailie Fraser, Dorothy Howard, Tricia Ngoon, Sean Kross, Steven Rick, Danilo Gasques Rodrigues

It might sound a little negative, but you don’t go to conferences to read papers and listen to talks. That’s a nice side effect of the fact that you’re all gathering under a common theme, so you can get together and listen to research and think about interesting stuff,” says Rick. “But at its core, you go for the network. You go to see people, to talk, to do stuff that’s not explicitly tied to the papers that are being presented. Because they’re all going to end up online, and you’ll read them later, and you hope that the talks give you something that’s not in the paper, and the conversations you have after the talks with the authors prompt an idea or thought that neither of you thought of, or build a collaboration or give you access to something that you didn’t have. You’re looking for a mutually beneficial social experience.


CHI 2019 Design Lab Publications:

How Guiding Questions Facilitate Feedback Exchange in Project-Based Learning, Amy Cook, Jessica Hammer, Salma Elsayed-Ali, and Steven P. Dow. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Inventive Scaffolds Catalyze Creative Learning, Tricia J. Ngoon. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Abstract from Doctoral Consortium

Managerial Visions: Stories of upgrading and maintaining the public restroom with IoT, Sarah Fox, Kiley Sobel, Daniela Rosner. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Practitioners Teaching Data Science in Industry and Academia, Sean Kross, Philip Guo. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

RePlay: Contextually Presenting Learning Videos Across Software Applications, C. Ailie Fraser, Tricia J. Ngoon, Mira Dontcheva, Scott Klemmer. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Social Applications for Inbodied Interaction: Improving Health Outcomes by Integrating Personal Knowledge, Community, and Data, Vineet Pandey. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Workshop Paper

Ways of Knowing When Research Subjects Care, Dorothy Howard, Lilly Irani. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Read Next

Smart Streetlights Data San Diego

San Diegans Shouldn’t Be Lab Rats for Innovation

Voice of San Diego Editorial by Design Lab Faculty Lilly Irani

In 2016, San Diego installed thousands of General Electric cameras, microphones and telecommunication devices on streetlights around the city. The City Council approved the project with little investigation, looking no further than the city’s casting of the project as environmental “sensors” and “nodes” that would analyze traffic and the atmosphere.

The city finally held town halls this year to explain the program to communities, but by then it was too late. Once installed, technologies of this type will outrun the uses for which they are designed and publicly justified. Over and over, researchers like myself have seen data creep — like mission creep — take hold as companies try to add value to data and monetize them.

Telestration: How Helena Mentis Applies Design Thinking to Surgery

Helena Mentis is the director of the Bodies in Motion Lab at University of Maryland, Baltimore County…

UCSD & Design Lab Students Participate In The Civic Digital Fellowship Program

UCSD & Design Lab Students participate in The Civic Digital Fellowship Program

Irene Guo, Neve Foresti, and Eric Richards, former and current UC San Diego Design Lab students, participated in the Civic Digital Fellowship Program, a ten-week program that equips students in different fields of technology (from data scientists to designers) to utilize their technical skills for public service; these students are referred to as Civic Digital Fellows. This program is the very first of its kind, and is modeled on four principles: the fellows must be compensated for their hard work through monetary gains, they tackle work with a high impact, their professional careers are developed, and finally, their community is cohort-based. 

The Worst F&#%ing Words Ever

Triton Magazine

Benjamin Bergen is a professor of cognitive science at UC San Diego and director of the Language and Cognition Lab, where he studies how our minds compute meaning and how talking interferes with safe driving—among many other things that don’t need to be bleeped. His latest book is What the F: What Swearing Reveals About Our Language, Our Brains, and Ourselves. He calls it “a book-length love letter to profanity.” You’ve been warned.
Design Lab Eric Hekler Public Health Technology

Eric Hekler Joins Design Lab Team

UC San Diego Design Lab is excited to welcome Eric Hekler, an Associate Professor in…

Indigenous knowledge and advocacy is now seen as vital to the fight against climate change

As nations develop strategies to combat climate change, they're beginning to turn to solutions from the indigenous communities that have been on the front lines of the efforts to protect the planet.

A 2021 report from the indigenous rights organization, the ICCA, details just how much the rest of the world depends on indigenous communities for preserving planetary health.

"In Latin America and the Caribbean, Indigenous and tribal peoples manage between 330 and 380 million hectares of forest," the ICCA report said. "Those forests store more than one-eighth of all the carbon in the world’s tropical forests and house a large portion of the world’s endangered animal and plant species. Almost half (45 per cent) of the large ‘wilderness’ areas in the Amazon Basin are in Indigenous territories and several studies have found that Indigenous peoples’ territories have lower rates of deforestation and lower risk of wildfires than state protected areas."
Back To Top