skip to Main Content
design lab #wearenotwaiting nightscout openaps

How DIY Designers are Impacting Healthcare

How DIY Designers are Impacting Healthcare

How DIY Designers are Impacting Healthcare

#WeAreNotWaiting is the social media movement of folks in the diabetes community who have come together to hack their own health; they’re developing platforms and apps and cloud-based solutions, and reverse-engineering existing, commercial products to help people with diabetes better utilize technology and health data for improved outcomes. And they are organized; in the form of groups such as Nightscout and OpenAPS,  these people have emerged as design leaders in the global DIY diabetes community.

I hosted a panel discussion at Design Forward in October to learn more about the #WeAreNotWaiting movement – how real people are really being impacted – and how commercial companies are responding. Panelists included OpenAPS founder Dana Lewis; DIY family patient member Clayton McCook; and Tandem Diabetes Chief Commercial Officer Brian Hansen.


Image: L to R: Steph Habif, Dana Lewis, Clayton McCook, Brian Hansen.

How does someone begin hacking their health?

Dana, who lives with Type 1 diabetes, began by talking with the technology manufacturers a few years ago. She had a very real problem: the alarms on her insulin pump were not loud enough to wake her during night time sleep. Meaning, if her blood sugar dipped to lethal levels while she was sleeping, she would not hear the alert. And there was no way to increase that noise on her pump at that time. Dana went to the commercial companies, “What can you do, can you make it better?” She said the responses she received included,  “It works for most people” and “we are working on the next version which should be available in a few years.”

Afraid she might die while she was waiting, Dana looked to social media. Turns out she wasn’t the only one who needed better personalization from her technology. She discovered a few other people living with diabetes had solved this problem by hacking into commercially available systems. Dana reached out and they shared and continued to refine code so that they could write their own scripts for how their systems work. Separate from commercially available systems. Separate from the FDA.

What she experienced was significant improvements and stability in her blood sugars.

BEFORE:


Image: Dana’s blood glucose readings using a commercial system

AFTER:


Image: Dana’s blood glucose readings using a DIY system


Image: Dana’s OpenAPS “rig”

Why are families choosing to use non-FDA approved devices?

When your child is diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes, you “spend the first few years in a fog, trying to learn everything and all the math required to keep your kid alive,” said Clayton. His daughter Lily was diagnosed at age three and is now nine years old. “We started off with one commercial product that worked fairly well, but when Lily wasn’t near us – at school or at the park – we didn’t know what was happening. Nightscout developed a system that enables parents or any caregiver to monitor a loved one with diabetes from afar. When I learned that, I knew I had to have it.”

“There is a lot of encouragement in the #WeAreNotWaiting community. At the core is altruism.”

Clayton further explained, “I was really scared. I’m not an engineer, I’ve never written a line of code, I still find my mind boggled with all of the amazing work happening. Dana and the rest of the community was so supportive; and now my daughter finds herself in range 90% of the time. She’s happy, she’s healthy, and when she goes to school I don’t worry about her.”


Image: Lily, Clayton, Olivia, and Cindy McCook. The McCooks are active members of the #WeAreNotWaiting movement.

How are commercial diabetes companies responding to the DIY community?

“As the commercial guy,” said Brian, “I like what Dana and the community are doing because it puts pressure on us, it puts pressure on the FDA to get there faster. This is raising the bar for what we have to design and bring to market as fast as possible. There is no space in healthcare more passionate than the diabetes space.”

One differentiator between the DIY community and commercial companies is on-demand customer support. “We have a 24/7 support system available to the patients who use our devices” confirmed Brian.

“I know that the community wants us to open our systems; the newest commercially available systems cannot be customized by DIY users. As an FDA approved device, we can’t do that.”


Image: Tandem Diabetes X2 insulin pump

What about the FDA?

OpenAPS and Nightscout regularly communicate with the FDA. Dana explained, “We have talked with them and they understand why we are doing what we are doing.”

The #WeAreNotWaiting community is not doing anything commercial. No money is changing hands. And the FDA serves to regulate commercial activity.  Related to this movement, the FDA has decided to exercise something called “enforcement discretion.” So when people hack their own health technology to change the system, they remove themselves from the protection of the FDA.

One thing is certain: the next few years will reveal which commercial companies can catch up to the customization experience a DIY system provides. Those companies will win.

By, Steph Habif

*The author does formal work with UCSD Design Lab, and Tandem Diabetes.

#WeAreNotWaiting is the social media movement of folks in the diabetes community who have come together to hack their own health; they’re developing platforms and apps and cloud-based solutions, and reverse-engineering existing, commercial products to help people with diabetes better utilize technology and health data for improved outcomes. And they are organized; in the form of groups such as Nightscout and OpenAPS,  these people have emerged as design leaders in the global DIY diabetes community.

I hosted a panel discussion at Design Forward in October to learn more about the #WeAreNotWaiting movement – how real people are really being impacted – and how commercial companies are responding. Panelists included OpenAPS founder Dana Lewis; DIY family patient member Clayton McCook; and Tandem Diabetes Chief Commercial Officer Brian Hansen.


Image: L to R: Steph Habif, Dana Lewis, Clayton McCook, Brian Hansen.

How does someone begin hacking their health?

Dana, who lives with Type 1 diabetes, began by talking with the technology manufacturers a few years ago. She had a very real problem: the alarms on her insulin pump were not loud enough to wake her during night time sleep. Meaning, if her blood sugar dipped to lethal levels while she was sleeping, she would not hear the alert. And there was no way to increase that noise on her pump at that time. Dana went to the commercial companies, “What can you do, can you make it better?” She said the responses she received included,  “It works for most people” and “we are working on the next version which should be available in a few years.”

Afraid she might die while she was waiting, Dana looked to social media. Turns out she wasn’t the only one who needed better personalization from her technology. She discovered a few other people living with diabetes had solved this problem by hacking into commercially available systems. Dana reached out and they shared and continued to refine code so that they could write their own scripts for how their systems work. Separate from commercially available systems. Separate from the FDA.

What she experienced was significant improvements and stability in her blood sugars.

BEFORE:


Image: Dana’s blood glucose readings using a commercial system

AFTER:


Image: Dana’s blood glucose readings using a DIY system


Image: Dana’s OpenAPS “rig”

Why are families choosing to use non-FDA approved devices?

When your child is diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes, you “spend the first few years in a fog, trying to learn everything and all the math required to keep your kid alive,” said Clayton. His daughter Lily was diagnosed at age three and is now nine years old. “We started off with one commercial product that worked fairly well, but when Lily wasn’t near us – at school or at the park – we didn’t know what was happening. Nightscout developed a system that enables parents or any caregiver to monitor a loved one with diabetes from afar. When I learned that, I knew I had to have it.”

“There is a lot of encouragement in the #WeAreNotWaiting community. At the core is altruism.”

Clayton further explained, “I was really scared. I’m not an engineer, I’ve never written a line of code, I still find my mind boggled with all of the amazing work happening. Dana and the rest of the community was so supportive; and now my daughter finds herself in range 90% of the time. She’s happy, she’s healthy, and when she goes to school I don’t worry about her.”


Image: Lily, Clayton, Olivia, and Cindy McCook. The McCooks are active members of the #WeAreNotWaiting movement.

How are commercial diabetes companies responding to the DIY community?

“As the commercial guy,” said Brian, “I like what Dana and the community are doing because it puts pressure on us, it puts pressure on the FDA to get there faster. This is raising the bar for what we have to design and bring to market as fast as possible. There is no space in healthcare more passionate than the diabetes space.”

One differentiator between the DIY community and commercial companies is on-demand customer support. “We have a 24/7 support system available to the patients who use our devices” confirmed Brian.

“I know that the community wants us to open our systems; the newest commercially available systems cannot be customized by DIY users. As an FDA approved device, we can’t do that.”


Image: Tandem Diabetes X2 insulin pump

What about the FDA?

OpenAPS and Nightscout regularly communicate with the FDA. Dana explained, “We have talked with them and they understand why we are doing what we are doing.”

The #WeAreNotWaiting community is not doing anything commercial. No money is changing hands. And the FDA serves to regulate commercial activity.  Related to this movement, the FDA has decided to exercise something called “enforcement discretion.” So when people hack their own health technology to change the system, they remove themselves from the protection of the FDA.

One thing is certain: the next few years will reveal which commercial companies can catch up to the customization experience a DIY system provides. Those companies will win.

By, Steph Habif

*The author does formal work with UCSD Design Lab, and Tandem Diabetes.

#WeAreNotWaiting is the social media movement of folks in the diabetes community who have come together to hack their own health; they’re developing platforms and apps and cloud-based solutions, and reverse-engineering existing, commercial products to help people with diabetes better utilize technology and health data for improved outcomes. And they are organized; in the form of groups such as Nightscout and OpenAPS,  these people have emerged as design leaders in the global DIY diabetes community.

I hosted a panel discussion at Design Forward in October to learn more about the #WeAreNotWaiting movement – how real people are really being impacted – and how commercial companies are responding. Panelists included OpenAPS founder Dana Lewis; DIY family patient member Clayton McCook; and Tandem Diabetes Chief Commercial Officer Brian Hansen.


Image: L to R: Steph Habif, Dana Lewis, Clayton McCook, Brian Hansen.

How does someone begin hacking their health?

Dana, who lives with Type 1 diabetes, began by talking with the technology manufacturers a few years ago. She had a very real problem: the alarms on her insulin pump were not loud enough to wake her during night time sleep. Meaning, if her blood sugar dipped to lethal levels while she was sleeping, she would not hear the alert. And there was no way to increase that noise on her pump at that time. Dana went to the commercial companies, “What can you do, can you make it better?” She said the responses she received included,  “It works for most people” and “we are working on the next version which should be available in a few years.”

Afraid she might die while she was waiting, Dana looked to social media. Turns out she wasn’t the only one who needed better personalization from her technology. She discovered a few other people living with diabetes had solved this problem by hacking into commercially available systems. Dana reached out and they shared and continued to refine code so that they could write their own scripts for how their systems work. Separate from commercially available systems. Separate from the FDA.

What she experienced was significant improvements and stability in her blood sugars.

BEFORE:


Image: Dana’s blood glucose readings using a commercial system

AFTER:


Image: Dana’s blood glucose readings using a DIY system


Image: Dana’s OpenAPS “rig”

Why are families choosing to use non-FDA approved devices?

When your child is diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes, you “spend the first few years in a fog, trying to learn everything and all the math required to keep your kid alive,” said Clayton. His daughter Lily was diagnosed at age three and is now nine years old. “We started off with one commercial product that worked fairly well, but when Lily wasn’t near us – at school or at the park – we didn’t know what was happening. Nightscout developed a system that enables parents or any caregiver to monitor a loved one with diabetes from afar. When I learned that, I knew I had to have it.”

“There is a lot of encouragement in the #WeAreNotWaiting community. At the core is altruism.”

Clayton further explained, “I was really scared. I’m not an engineer, I’ve never written a line of code, I still find my mind boggled with all of the amazing work happening. Dana and the rest of the community was so supportive; and now my daughter finds herself in range 90% of the time. She’s happy, she’s healthy, and when she goes to school I don’t worry about her.”


Image: Lily, Clayton, Olivia, and Cindy McCook. The McCooks are active members of the #WeAreNotWaiting movement.

How are commercial diabetes companies responding to the DIY community?

“As the commercial guy,” said Brian, “I like what Dana and the community are doing because it puts pressure on us, it puts pressure on the FDA to get there faster. This is raising the bar for what we have to design and bring to market as fast as possible. There is no space in healthcare more passionate than the diabetes space.”

One differentiator between the DIY community and commercial companies is on-demand customer support. “We have a 24/7 support system available to the patients who use our devices” confirmed Brian.

“I know that the community wants us to open our systems; the newest commercially available systems cannot be customized by DIY users. As an FDA approved device, we can’t do that.”


Image: Tandem Diabetes X2 insulin pump

What about the FDA?

OpenAPS and Nightscout regularly communicate with the FDA. Dana explained, “We have talked with them and they understand why we are doing what we are doing.”

The #WeAreNotWaiting community is not doing anything commercial. No money is changing hands. And the FDA serves to regulate commercial activity.  Related to this movement, the FDA has decided to exercise something called “enforcement discretion.” So when people hack their own health technology to change the system, they remove themselves from the protection of the FDA.

One thing is certain: the next few years will reveal which commercial companies can catch up to the customization experience a DIY system provides. Those companies will win.

By, Steph Habif

*The author does formal work with UCSD Design Lab, and Tandem Diabetes.

Read Next

Waste Management

Waste is an enormous problem. But recycling is the wrong solution.

Part 2 of a FastCompany editorial on Recycling by Don Norman

I am proud to be one of the developers of what is today called human-centered design. That is design that always starts off understanding the needs, capabilities, and desires of people. It has four basic principles, all four of which are being violated by today’s recycling craze.

Recycling is broken. There’s little clarity about what can and can’t be recycled, and the rules change from one city to the next, and sometimes even within the same city. According to the World Bank, we produce 1.4 billion tons of waste a year worldwide, a figure that’s expected to increase to 2.4 billion tons by 2025. Waste is an enormous problem that needs to be addressed if we’re going to prevent the worst effects of climate change. But recycling is the wrong solution.
Smart Streetlights

Community members call for end to ‘Smart Streetlights’ in San Diego

KUSI NEWS Interviews Design Lab Faculty Lilly Irani

More than a dozen community groups are calling on the City of San Diego to turn off thousands of cameras positioned on streetlights around San Diego.

The “Smart Streetlights” were approved by the San Diego City Council in December 2016, and there are currently 4,700 installed according to the city’s website.

The cameras collect real-time data including video and audio, which the city says helps save money and increase public safety. However, activists called the technology a major privacy and civil rights concern.

City officials have said that these streetlights are not being used for spying.
Design Lab Uc San Diego Ailie Fraser Tricia Ngoon

CHI 2018 Conference Spotlights Design Lab Work

This year’s ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems — more commonly known…

Waste Management

Waste is an enormous problem. But recycling is the wrong solution.

Part 2 of a FastCompany editorial on Recycling by Don Norman

I am proud to be one of the developers of what is today called human-centered design. That is design that always starts off understanding the needs, capabilities, and desires of people. It has four basic principles, all four of which are being violated by today’s recycling craze.

Recycling is broken. There’s little clarity about what can and can’t be recycled, and the rules change from one city to the next, and sometimes even within the same city. According to the World Bank, we produce 1.4 billion tons of waste a year worldwide, a figure that’s expected to increase to 2.4 billion tons by 2025. Waste is an enormous problem that needs to be addressed if we’re going to prevent the worst effects of climate change. But recycling is the wrong solution.
Designathon

Designing UC San Diego’s New Trolley Stop | Pepper Canyon Mobility Hub Designathon Video

Watch the 14-minute Pepper Canyon Mobility Hub Designathon Video

Over 250 UC San Diego students, neighbors, and future transit users gathered on April 6-7, 2019 for the first-ever Designathon: an intensive, immersive event where interdisciplinary teams design solutions for real-world challenges. This Designathon focused on the Pepper Canyon Station, which aspires to be an ecologically, socially, and technologically friendly mobility hub on the UCSD campus, set to open in 2020.

Executive Producer: Michele Morris
Producers & Directors: Stephanie Sherman, Ash Eliza Smith, Ian Strelsky
Camera Operators: Clint Evangelista, Qiyi Fan, Alice Medrano, Steven Phung, Yimeng Sun
Editors: Steven Phung, Yimeng Sun
Story Consultant: Griffin Middelson
Animators: Weilun Yao, Lilly Gee
Sound Designers: Steven Phung
Music Composers: Remy Rose, Riain Hager, Forrest Reid
Trolley Stops Designathon UCSD Design Lab

Designathon Seeks to Reimagine Trolley Stops

On April 6+7, 2019, on UC San Diego campus Warren Mall, over 200+ students, neighbors, designers, technologists, and media-makers will come together for the Pepper Canyon Mobility Hub Designathon, an event developing proposals that will support the transformation Pepper Canyon Trolley Station at UCSD campus, currently under construction, into a dynamic, multimodal mobility hub. The event is produced through a partnership between The UC San Diego Design Lab, SANDAG, UC San Diego Campus Planning, the UC San Diego Young Planners’ Society, Sixth College Culture, Art, Technology program, and UC San Diego Urban Planning Program.
Back To Top